The results are showing that resolution acuity as measured by the motion discrimination task is unaffected by irregularity in the array whereas acuity measured with the orientation discrimination task increases by as much as two-fold for a highly irregular array.

This result suggests that a motion discrimination task may be preferable to an orientation discrimination task in a clinical testing routine.

Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10
Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20
Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30
Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34

WWWaveTM 1996
World Wide Web automated virtual environment TM 1996
Kevin Haggerty, Indiana University.

This slide show was automatically converted to web pages by the WWWave.